[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1460484484-22395-17-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:08:03 +0100
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@....com>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 16/17] drm/radeon: hold reference to fences in radeon_sa_bo_new (3.17 and older)
3.16.7-ckt27 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: =?UTF-8?q?Nicolai=20H=C3=A4hnle?= <nicolai.haehnle@....com>
commit f6ff4f67cdf8455d0a4226eeeaf5af17c37d05eb upstream.
An arbitrary amount of time can pass between spin_unlock and
radeon_fence_wait_any, so we need to ensure that nobody frees the
fences from under us.
Based on the analogous fix for amdgpu.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@....com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com> (v1 + fix)
Tested-by: Lutz Euler <lutz.euler@...enet.de>
[ nicolai:
Backport of upstream commit f6ff4f67cdf8455d0a4226eeeaf5af17c37d05eb, with
an additional NULL pointer guard that is required for kernels 3.17 and older.
To be precise, any kernel that does *not* have commit 954605ca3 "drm/radeon:
use common fence implementation for fences, v4" requires this additional
NULL pointer guard.]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
index adcf3e2f07da..ef86509fe5f6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
@@ -349,8 +349,15 @@ int radeon_sa_bo_new(struct radeon_device *rdev,
/* see if we can skip over some allocations */
} while (radeon_sa_bo_next_hole(sa_manager, fences, tries));
+ for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i) {
+ if (fences[i])
+ radeon_fence_ref(fences[i]);
+ }
+
spin_unlock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
r = radeon_fence_wait_any(rdev, fences, false);
+ for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
+ radeon_fence_unref(&fences[i]);
spin_lock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
/* if we have nothing to wait for block */
if (r == -ENOENT) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists