linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 02/16] staging: lustre: clio: incorrect assertions in 'enable-invariants'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1460492056-31792-3-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:14:02 -0400
From:	James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
	Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@...el.com>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/16] staging: lustre: clio: incorrect assertions in 'enable-invariants'

From: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@...el.com>

Fixed several incorrect assumptions in 'enable-invariants'.

Signed-off-by: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@...el.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3521
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/6832
Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam <bobijam@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_page.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_page.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_page.c
index 39095e7..b754f51 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_page.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_page.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ void cl_page_disown0(const struct lu_env *env,
 
 	state = pg->cp_state;
 	PINVRNT(env, pg, state == CPS_OWNED || state == CPS_FREEING);
-	PINVRNT(env, pg, cl_page_invariant(pg));
+	PINVRNT(env, pg, cl_page_invariant(pg) || state == CPS_FREEING);
 	cl_page_owner_clear(pg);
 
 	if (state == CPS_OWNED)
@@ -670,7 +670,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cl_page_unassume);
 void cl_page_disown(const struct lu_env *env,
 		    struct cl_io *io, struct cl_page *pg)
 {
-	PINVRNT(env, pg, cl_page_is_owned(pg, io));
+	PINVRNT(env, pg, cl_page_is_owned(pg, io) ||
+		pg->cp_state == CPS_FREEING);
 
 	io = cl_io_top(io);
 	cl_page_disown0(env, io, pg);
-- 
1.7.1