[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1460526501.32184.4.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:48:21 +0800
From: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Flora Fu <flora.fu@...iatek.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mfd: mt6397: check the EPROBE_DEFER from
platform_get_irq.
On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 09:50 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016, Henry Chen wrote:
>
> > If get the -EPROBE_DEFER from platform_get_irq, it should return back directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > index 15050cb..b9b1e28 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > @@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> >
> > pmic->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (pmic->irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> ... is more common, as it covers more bases, etc.
Okay, the interrupt should be a required properties, if get failed just
return back.
I will also change the binding doc.
Thanks.
>
> > switch (id & 0xff) {
> > case MT6323_CID_CODE:
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists