[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160413075235.GB3832@osiris>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:52:35 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 4
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:34:08PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:26:35 +0200
> Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 05:51:09PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Monday 04 April 2016 09:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >Changes since 20160401:
> > >
> > > s390 allmodconfig build fails with the error:
> > >
> > > arch/s390/crypto/ghash_s390.c:14:24: fatal error: crypt_s390.h: No
> > > such file or directory
> > > #include "crypt_s390.h"
> > > ^
> > >
> > > build log is at:
> > > https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/jobs/120536718
> > >
> > > caused by the commit -
> > > ce69a690149c ("s390/crypto: cleanup and move the header with the
> > > cpacf definitions") which removed the file "crypt_s390.h"
> >
> > Thanks for letting us know!
> >
> > I just removed that specific patch from the 'features' branch again. It was
> > incomplete since it didn't convert the ghash module at all.
> >
> > No idea what Martin was thinking when pushing that patch.
>
> That is strange. On my local features branch that I use to push to kerne.org
> there is no ghash commit. The last commit is this:
Nobody said there is a ghash commit ;)
> commit ce69a690149c7431d05b4679409ab8fa6ad3a09f
> Author: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> Date: Thu Mar 17 15:22:12 2016 +0100
>
> s390/crypto: cleanup and move the header with the cpacf definitions
>
> which Heiko now removed. My guest right now is that the ghash commit stems
> from another tree merged into linux-next and we simply have an unresolved
> dependency here. I do have an updated ghash patch that includes the correct
> header.
Your patch did not convert/touch arch/s390/crypto/ghash_s390.c which is
very old code. And you need to do more within that file than just changing
the include.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists