linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:16:26 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable

On Wed 13-04-16 11:08:30, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
[...]
> > +ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable)
> > +	save_common_regs
> > +	movq %rax,%rdi
> > +	call rwsem_down_write_failed_killable
> > +	restore_common_regs
> > +	ret
> > +ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable)
> 
> Got this objtool warning on x86-64 allyesconfig:
> 
>   arch/x86/lib/rwsem.o: warning: objtool: call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable()+0xe: call without frame pointer save/setup

Peter has already pointed that out. This is because the 4.5 which I was
basing my work on doesn't have 3387a535ce62 ("x86/asm: Create stack
frames in rwsem functions") which shown up in 4.6-rc1. He mentioned to
add the missing FRAME_{BEGIN,END} during the merge AFAIR.

Does that sound reasonable to you or should I rebase?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs