linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/cpuacct: Check for NULL when using task_pt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:21:22 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	efault@....de, htejun@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tj@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	zhaolei@...fujitsu.com, yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com, hpa@...or.com,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/cpuacct: Check for NULL when using task_pt_regs()


* Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 09:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > * Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org> [2016-04-06 21:59:50]:
> > > 
> > > > Looks good, and the patch below does fix the oops for me.
> > > > 
> > > > Anton
> > > > --
> > > > 
> > > > task_pt_regs() can return NULL for kernel threads, so add a check.
> > > > This fixes an oops at boot on ppc64.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
> > > 
> > > Works for me too.
> > > 
> > > Reported-and-Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Could someone please re-send the fix, because it has not reached me nor lkml.
> 
> It did hit LKML:
> 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160406215950.04bc3f0b@kryten
> 
> But that did have some verbiage at the top.
> 
> Anton's also resent it directly To you.

So it was in my Spam folder, due to the following SPF softfail:

  Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning anton@...ba.org does not designate 198.145.29.136 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.145.29.136;

have the patch now.

Thanks,

	Ingo