[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160413124034.GI2000@uranus.lan>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:40:34 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
zab@...hat.com, emunson@...mai.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, josh@...htriplett.org, xemul@...allels.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, milosz@...in.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
arnd@...db.de, ebiederm@...ssion.com, iulia.manda21@...il.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mguzik@...hat.com,
adobriyan@...il.com, dave@...olabs.net, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:21:35PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > +SYSCALL_DEFINE0(getumask)
> > +{
> > + return current->fs->umask;
> > +}
>
> The convention seems to be to call current_umask(), instead of
> inlining its contents.
Yes, please use existing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists