[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <570E7B4F.8060507@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 22:31:03 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal
warning" to the regulator tree
On Wednesday 13 April 2016 09:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> The patch
>
> regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning
>
> has been applied to the regulator tree at
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
>
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
>
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
>
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
>
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> From d2d5437bdfdde20a75bdf59db1c1a77721613b22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:29:45 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning
>
Thank you very much for accepting patch. Hope at this time, it will pass
the build test robot.
Unfortunately, it was reverted 2 times due to build issue on random config.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists