linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc-nand: Set omap2-nand's parent dev to GPMC dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160413194027.GZ5995@atomide.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:40:27 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc:	"Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>, nsekhar@...com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc-nand: Set omap2-nand's parent
 dev to GPMC dev

* Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> [160314 02:16]:
> 
> I think it is OK to assume that NAND DMA won't work with legacy boot.
> Tony any objections? I see that board-ldp.c is the only legacy user
> of NAND. When can we drop support for it?

Sorry for the delay, just nocied this one. Let's not touch the
board-*.c files until we just remove them except for fixes.
It's OK to assume legacy booting does not support DMA.

Regards,

Tony