linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] MCS spinlock: Use smp_cond_load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1460580544.2709.31.camel@j-VirtualBox>
Date:	Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:49:04 -0700
From:	Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Rudd, Terry (HP Cloud Systems Linux R&D)" <terry.rudd@....com>,
	"Long, Wai Man" <waiman.long@....com>,
	"boqun.feng@...il.com" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	"dave@...olabs.net" <dave@...olabs.net>,
	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
	"kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>, jason.low2@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MCS spinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire()

On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 10:43 -0700, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:02:17PM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> > For qspinlocks on ARM64, we would like to use WFE instead
> > of purely spinning. Qspinlocks internally have lock
> > contenders spin on an MCS lock.
> > 
> > Update arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended() such that it uses
> > the new smp_cond_load_acquire() so that ARM64 can also
> > override this spin loop with its own implementation using WFE.
> > 
> > On x86, it can also cheaper to use this than spinning on
> > smp_load_acquire().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
> 
> FWIW, we just override arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended entirely for arch/arm/
> and use wfe there so we could do the same for arm64 in mainline already.

Right, I was also thinking about that, although when we use
smp_cond_load_acquire() in the generic implementation, would we just end
up overriding it for the arch/arm64 version with the same thing?  :)

Jason