[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB=NE6Uj9m4==e8XKBnQCfjGtXwALCSKwzg4RP5UfDpjXhDCCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:28:56 -0700
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence
before allocating descs for legacy IRQs
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com> wrote:
> Note that paravirt_has() is being removed by
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-04/msg01415.html so
> presumably we'd use new struct x86_legacy_features instead (copying Luis so
> that if this is acceptable he could add it to his next spin).
That should be added as a separate patch then as its new feature not
replacing existing code.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists