[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160413234703.615f3016@grimm.local.home>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:47:03 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
zab@...hat.com, emunson@...mai.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, josh@...htriplett.org, xemul@...allels.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, milosz@...in.com, arnd@...db.de,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
iulia.manda21@...il.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
mguzik@...hat.com, adobriyan@...il.com, dave@...olabs.net,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, gorcunov@...il.com, fw@...eb.enyo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 06:59:50 -0700
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> Why not add this to the ktest infrastructure, we strongly encourage that
> for new syscalls, along with a man page patch.
Do you mean the "selftest infrastructure"? As I don't see how this
could be used with ktest.
See tools/testing/selftests/
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists