[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <570EE5CA.5000801@sonymobile.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:35:22 -0700
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...ymobile.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] ARM: qcom: silence an uninitialized variable warning
On 04/12/2016 11:45 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> It's harmless but, if "enable" isn't set, then we pass uninitialized
> values to qcom_coincell_chgr_config(). The values aren't used, but
> let's silence the warning anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c b/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c
> index 7b4a2da..829a61d 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ static int qcom_coincell_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct qcom_coincell chgr;
> - u32 rset, vset;
> + u32 rset = 0;
> + u32 vset = 0;
> bool enable;
> int rc;
>
>
Looks OK to me. Thanks for the warning cleanup!
Acked-by: Tim Bird
-- Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists