linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] FUSE: Improve aio directIO write performance for size extending writes.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:02:44 +0530
From:	Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	fuse-devel <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FUSE: Improve aio directIO write performance for size
 extending writes.

*ping*

Last time it bounced off the fuse mailing list.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com> wrote:
> While sending the blocking directIO in fuse, the write request is broken
> into sub-requests, each of default size 128k and all the requests are sent
> in non-blocking background mode if async_dio mode is supported by libfuse.
> The process which issue the write wait for the completion of all the
> sub-requests. Sending multiple requests parallely gives a chance to perform
> parallel writes in the user space fuse implementation if it is
> multi-threaded and hence improves the performance.
>
> When there is a size extending aio dio write, we switch to
> blocking mode so that we can properly update the size of the file after
> completion of the writes. However, in this situation all the sub-requests
> are sent in serialized manner where the next request is sent only after
> receiving the reply of the current request. Hence the multi-threaded user
> space implementation is not utilized properly.
>
> This patch changes the size extending aio dio behavior to exactly follow
> blocking dio. For multi threaded fuse implementation having 10 threads and
> using buffer size of 64MB to perform async directIO, we are getting double
> the speed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/file.c   |   16 ++++++++--------
>  fs/fuse/fuse_i.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index 9dde38f..b4f8b83 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -572,11 +572,11 @@ static void fuse_aio_complete(struct fuse_io_priv *io, int err, ssize_t pos)
>                 io->bytes = pos;
>
>         left = --io->reqs;
> -       if (!left && is_sync)
> +       if (!left && (is_sync || io->blocking_aio))
>                 complete(io->done);
>         spin_unlock(&io->lock);
>
> -       if (!left && !is_sync) {
> +       if (!left && !is_sync && !io->blocking_aio) {
>                 ssize_t res = fuse_get_res_by_io(io);
>
>                 if (res >= 0) {
> @@ -2884,17 +2884,17 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t offset)
>          */
>         io->async = async_dio;
>         io->iocb = iocb;
> +       io->blocking_aio = false;
>
>         /*
> -        * We cannot asynchronously extend the size of a file. We have no method
> -        * to wait on real async I/O requests, so we must submit this request
> -        * synchronously.
> +        * We cannot asynchronously extend the size of a file.
> +        * In such case the aio will behave exactly like sync io.
>          */
>         if (!is_sync && (offset + count > i_size) &&
>             iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)
> -               io->async = false;
> +               io->blocking_aio = true;
>
> -       if (io->async && is_sync) {
> +       if (io->async && (is_sync | io->blocking_aio)) {
>                 /*
>                  * Additional reference to keep io around after
>                  * calling fuse_aio_complete()
> @@ -2914,7 +2914,7 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t offset)
>                 fuse_aio_complete(io, ret < 0 ? ret : 0, -1);
>
>                 /* we have a non-extending, async request, so return */
> -               if (!is_sync)
> +               if (!is_sync && !io->blocking_aio)
>                         return -EIOCBQUEUED;
>
>                 wait_for_completion(&wait);
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> index eddbe02..a7cf03f 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ struct fuse_io_priv {
>         struct kiocb *iocb;
>         struct file *file;
>         struct completion *done;
> +       bool blocking_aio;
>  };
>
>  #define FUSE_IO_PRIV_SYNC(f) \
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>