[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaQra43TxaW4wSTHMQDVNxi+8C5+wWFNy9wi0KktqrU2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:52:16 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Paweł Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] gpio: of: Return error if gpio hog configuration failed
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 April 2016 06:13 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Thank you very much for accepting the patch.
> I think 1/5 and 2/5 is also fine as there is no more comment on this.
I have applied them now.
I had a comment on 1/5, I wanted a confirmation that
it was done to be able to set status = "disabled" in the
device node.
I assume this is true so now I added that to the commit
blurb.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists