[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160414184005.GC7821@HEDWIG.INI.CMU.EDU>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:40:06 -0400
From: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <somlo@....edu>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] firmware: qemu_fw_cfg.c: potential unintialized variable
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:33:37PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> It acpi_acquire_global_lock() return AE_NOT_CONFIGURED then "glk" isn't
^ ^
If returns
> initialized, which, if you got very unlucky, could cause a bug.
In principle I'm OK with being cautious and initializing local
variables just in case, but I'm curious:
acpi_acquire_global_lock() (and its friend, acpi_release_global_lock())
are both wrapped inside the same macro -- ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS
-- which either makes them both do something useful, or makes them both
no-ops returning a hardcoded AE_NOT_CONFIGURED.
So what else do you think could be a way to get very unlucky ?
Otherwise, sure: Just 'cause we're paranoid doesn't mean someone's not
out to get us! :)
Thanks,
--Gabriel
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> index d999fe3..0e20116 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static inline u16 fw_cfg_sel_endianness(u16 key)
> static inline void fw_cfg_read_blob(u16 key,
> void *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> {
> - u32 glk;
> + u32 glk = -1U;
> acpi_status status;
>
> /* If we have ACPI, ensure mutual exclusion against any potential
Powered by blists - more mailing lists