[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160414192540.GD20512@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:25:40 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux@....linux.org.uk, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, liviu.dudau@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, peter@...leysoftware.com,
pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:47:57AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/04/16 15:02, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch series provides the basic support for running ucLinux on V2M-MPS2
> > platform.
> >
> > With these patches applied ucLinux can be run on both HW and FVP models
> > with Cortex-M3/M4/M7 configurations.
>
> Any objection to get it merged?
>
> Sudeep Holla noticed that there is merge conflict against linux-next
> with PIC32 uart (Makefile and serial_core.h), so should I provide
> conflict resolution or do rebase on someone's branch?
>
> Anyway, I'd be glad to know how it should be processed further?
I have no objection to the tty/serial changes, so if this all goes
through the arm-soc tree, that's fine with me.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists