lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:28:01 -0400 From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...n.nu> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>, Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>, dledford@...hat.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:23:28AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > Intel as usual decided to do it in their way and the result is presented > on this mailing list. Excuse me, but this statement is completely unfair. We were specifically asked by Al and Linus to fix our char device with regards to the write/writev inconsistency. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg34451.html Which is _exactly_ what this patch series does. Do you have a technical reason that this patch series does not fix the write/writev issue brought up by Al? Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists