[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb0xKdwHqC-dof2sjvCftLs6-Vy14_x4joY12vLE=c13w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:44:23 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] soc/tegra: pmc: Use BIT macro for register field definition
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> Does this matter at all? We use the explicit notation in quite a number
> of places and it works great. I'd like to avoid needless churn unless
> there is a very good reason to switch.
I am softly enforcing <linux/bitops.h> in the GPIO subsystem
because I think it's a great perceptual aid, I can skim code
faster if this is used, easier for the brain to handle and thus
simplifies maintenance.
Others may disagree on its virtues.
It is not a subjective opinion, but proving the point needs
perceptual psychology research.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists