| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:07:55 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 28/28] mm, page_alloc: Defer debugging checks of pages allocated from the PCP
Every page allocated checks a number of page fields for validity. This
catches corruption bugs of pages that are already freed but it is expensive.
This patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages only when
the PCP lists are being refilled. All compound pages are checked. This
potentially avoids debugging checks entirely if the PCP lists are never
emptied and refilled so some corruption issues may be missed. Full checking
requires DEBUG_VM.
With the two deferred debugging patches applied, the impact to a page
allocator microbenchmark is
4.6.0-rc3 4.6.0-rc3
inline-v3r6 deferalloc-v3r7
Min alloc-odr0-1 344.00 ( 0.00%) 317.00 ( 7.85%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 248.00 ( 0.00%) 231.00 ( 6.85%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 209.00 ( 0.00%) 192.00 ( 8.13%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 181.00 ( 0.00%) 166.00 ( 8.29%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 168.00 ( 0.00%) 154.00 ( 8.33%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 161.00 ( 0.00%) 148.00 ( 8.07%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 158.00 ( 0.00%) 145.00 ( 8.23%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 156.00 ( 0.00%) 143.00 ( 8.33%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 168.00 ( 0.00%) 154.00 ( 8.33%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 178.00 ( 0.00%) 167.00 ( 6.18%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 186.00 ( 0.00%) 174.00 ( 6.45%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 192.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 6.25%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 198.00 ( 0.00%) 184.00 ( 7.07%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 200.00 ( 0.00%) 188.00 ( 6.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 201.00 ( 0.00%) 188.00 ( 6.47%)
Min free-odr0-1 189.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 4.76%)
Min free-odr0-2 132.00 ( 0.00%) 126.00 ( 4.55%)
Min free-odr0-4 104.00 ( 0.00%) 99.00 ( 4.81%)
Min free-odr0-8 90.00 ( 0.00%) 85.00 ( 5.56%)
Min free-odr0-16 84.00 ( 0.00%) 80.00 ( 4.76%)
Min free-odr0-32 80.00 ( 0.00%) 76.00 ( 5.00%)
Min free-odr0-64 78.00 ( 0.00%) 74.00 ( 5.13%)
Min free-odr0-128 77.00 ( 0.00%) 73.00 ( 5.19%)
Min free-odr0-256 94.00 ( 0.00%) 91.00 ( 3.19%)
Min free-odr0-512 108.00 ( 0.00%) 112.00 ( -3.70%)
Min free-odr0-1024 115.00 ( 0.00%) 118.00 ( -2.61%)
Min free-odr0-2048 120.00 ( 0.00%) 125.00 ( -4.17%)
Min free-odr0-4096 123.00 ( 0.00%) 129.00 ( -4.88%)
Min free-odr0-8192 126.00 ( 0.00%) 130.00 ( -3.17%)
Min free-odr0-16384 126.00 ( 0.00%) 131.00 ( -3.97%)
Note that the free paths for large numbers of pages is impacted as the
debugging cost gets shifted into that path when the page data is no longer
necessarily cache-hot.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index b5722790c846..147c0d55ed32 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1704,7 +1704,41 @@ static inline bool free_pages_prezeroed(bool poisoned)
page_poisoning_enabled() && poisoned;
}
-static int prep_new_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_flags,
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
+static bool check_pcp_refill(struct page *page)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool check_new_pcp(struct page *page)
+{
+ return check_new_page(page);
+}
+#else
+static bool check_pcp_refill(struct page *page)
+{
+ return check_new_page(page);
+}
+static bool check_new_pcp(struct page *page)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_VM */
+
+static bool check_new_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
+{
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
+ struct page *p = page + i;
+
+ if (unlikely(check_new_page(p)))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static void prep_new_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_flags,
unsigned int alloc_flags)
{
int i;
@@ -1712,8 +1746,6 @@ static int prep_new_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_flags,
for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
struct page *p = page + i;
- if (unlikely(check_new_page(p)))
- return 1;
if (poisoned)
poisoned &= page_is_poisoned(p);
}
@@ -1745,8 +1777,6 @@ static int prep_new_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_flags,
set_page_pfmemalloc(page);
else
clear_page_pfmemalloc(page);
-
- return 0;
}
/*
@@ -2168,6 +2198,9 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
if (unlikely(page == NULL))
break;
+ if (unlikely(check_pcp_refill(page)))
+ continue;
+
/*
* Split buddy pages returned by expand() are received here
* in physical page order. The page is added to the callers and
@@ -2579,20 +2612,22 @@ struct page *buffered_rmqueue(struct zone *preferred_zone,
struct list_head *list;
local_irq_save(flags);
- pcp = &this_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset)->pcp;
- list = &pcp->lists[migratetype];
- if (list_empty(list)) {
- pcp->count += rmqueue_bulk(zone, 0,
- pcp->batch, list,
- migratetype, cold);
- if (unlikely(list_empty(list)))
- goto failed;
- }
+ do {
+ pcp = &this_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset)->pcp;
+ list = &pcp->lists[migratetype];
+ if (list_empty(list)) {
+ pcp->count += rmqueue_bulk(zone, 0,
+ pcp->batch, list,
+ migratetype, cold);
+ if (unlikely(list_empty(list)))
+ goto failed;
+ }
- if (cold)
- page = list_last_entry(list, struct page, lru);
- else
- page = list_first_entry(list, struct page, lru);
+ if (cold)
+ page = list_last_entry(list, struct page, lru);
+ else
+ page = list_first_entry(list, struct page, lru);
+ } while (page && check_new_pcp(page));
__dec_zone_state(zone, NR_ALLOC_BATCH);
list_del(&page->lru);
@@ -2605,14 +2640,16 @@ struct page *buffered_rmqueue(struct zone *preferred_zone,
WARN_ON_ONCE((gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL) && (order > 1));
spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
- page = NULL;
- if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER) {
- page = __rmqueue_smallest(zone, order, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC);
- if (page)
- trace_mm_page_alloc_zone_locked(page, order, migratetype);
- }
- if (!page)
- page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype);
+ do {
+ page = NULL;
+ if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER) {
+ page = __rmqueue_smallest(zone, order, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC);
+ if (page)
+ trace_mm_page_alloc_zone_locked(page, order, migratetype);
+ }
+ if (!page)
+ page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype);
+ } while (page && check_new_pages(page, order));
spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
if (!page)
goto failed;
@@ -2979,8 +3016,7 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
page = buffered_rmqueue(ac->preferred_zoneref->zone, zone, order,
gfp_mask, alloc_flags, ac->migratetype);
if (page) {
- if (prep_new_page(page, order, gfp_mask, alloc_flags))
- goto try_this_zone;
+ prep_new_page(page, order, gfp_mask, alloc_flags);
/*
* If this is a high-order atomic allocation then check
--
2.6.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists