linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5710B4CE.4060405@arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:30:54 +0100
From:	Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
To:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	mark.rutland@....com, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	andy.shevchenko@...il.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, peter@...leysoftware.com, arnd@...db.de,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, liviu.dudau@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System

On 15/04/16 09:52, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14/04/16 20:25, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:47:57AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 01/04/16 15:02, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This patch series provides the basic support for running ucLinux on
>>>> V2M-MPS2
>>>> platform.
>>>>
>>>> With these patches applied ucLinux can be run on both HW and FVP models
>>>> with Cortex-M3/M4/M7 configurations.
>>>
>>> Any objection to get it merged?
>>>
>>> Sudeep Holla noticed that there is merge conflict against linux-next
>>> with PIC32 uart (Makefile and serial_core.h), so should I provide
>>> conflict resolution or do rebase on someone's branch?
>>>
>>> Anyway, I'd be glad to know how it should be processed further?
>>
>> I have no objection to the tty/serial changes, so if this all goes
>> through the arm-soc tree, that's fine with me.
>>
> 
> Thanks Greg, can I take this as Ack ? arm-soc guys might expect to see
> that tag :)
> 
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> I have pulled this series into
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git
> for-next/armv7-vexpress-updates
> 
> I will stick Greg's tag when it comes.
> 

Everything looks fine! Thanks everyone for making it happen!

Cheers
Vladimir