linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:09:42 +0200
From:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, <javier@...hile0.org>,
	<fcooper@...com>, <nsekhar@...com>,
	<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	<dwmw2@...radead.org>, <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC
 NAND on non-OMAP platforms

Hi Roger,

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:34:04 +0300
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> wrote:

> Tony & Boris,
> 
> On 14/04/16 00:25, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> [160407 03:10]:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As this series has cross dependency between omap and mtd subsystems,
> >> I'll set up a immutable branch which omap-soc and l2-mtd must
> >> merge in together to avoid any conflicts/breakage during integration.
> >>
> >> Brian has acked all mtd patches. Tony needs to give his Ack for the
> >> gpmc driver part and then I can provide the immutable branch.
> > 
> > Looks good to me, please feel free to add:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> > 
> 
> I've added Tony and Rob's Acked-by tags and pushed the patches at the
> below PULL request.
> 
> Please take this into omap-soc and l2-mtd trees. Thanks.

I Pulled this branch into nand/next and had to resolve a few conflicts
(as you may have noticed, a few other reworks in the NAND and MTD layer
have been merged in the meantime).

It compiles, but I'm not sure it works correctly (I pushed the result
to nand/next-with-gpmc-rework [1]). Could you test it before I push this
to nand/next?

Thanks,

Boris

[1]https://github.com/linux-nand/linux/tree/nand/next-with-gpmc-rework


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com