[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGsZ3h87i-EzpSKyFcX71L1AvGdc04=ewr59oxp9rBtHHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:40:25 -0400
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>
Cc: "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...gle.com>,
Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...gle.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/8] drm/fence: create DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_OUT_FENCE flag
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org> wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
>
> This flag tells drm_atomic_ioctl that we want to get a per-crtc out-fence
> fd back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
> ---
> include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h
> index 7a7856e..39905cc 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h
> @@ -582,13 +582,15 @@ struct drm_mode_destroy_dumb {
> #define DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY 0x0100
> #define DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_NONBLOCK 0x0200
> #define DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET 0x0400
> +#define DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_OUT_FENCE 0x0800
>
> #define DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_FLAGS (\
> DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT |\
> DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC |\
> DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY |\
> DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_NONBLOCK |\
> - DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET)
> + DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET |\
> + DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_OUT_FENCE)
just to be pedantic / bisectable, perhaps this should be squashed in
to patch that actually starts using this flag? Otherwise there is an
intermediate state in git where the flag is accepted but ignored..
BR,
-R
> struct drm_mode_atomic {
> __u32 flags;
> --
> 2.5.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists