linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: save register context on suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:13:14 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: save register context on suspend

On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 16:54 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 04:35:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > All configurations are lost and the registers will have
> > default values when the hardware is suspended and resumed,
> > so saving the private register space context on suspend, and
> > restoring it on resume.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Lee's Ack? I'm confused? Who is meant to take this patch?
> 
> > 
> > ---
> > Since v2:
> > - add Ack
> > - remove Fixes tag
> Why? This is a fix. And it also needs to go into the stable trees as
> well, so we will also need tag it with "Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org".

So, in that case v2 is what you want, right?

Lee, do I need to resend v2 as v4 or something else is required?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy