[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160415143122.GF3589@x1>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:31:22 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, ajitpal.singh@...com
Subject: Re: [RESEND 07/11] pwm: sti: Initialise PWM Capture channel data
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:39:41PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:32:05PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > +struct sti_cpt_data {
> > > > + u32 snapshot[3];
> > > > + int index;
> > > > + int gpio;
> > >
> > > On a side-note, this should probably use struct gpio_desc * instead of
> > > an integer along with the gpiod_*() APIs for the GPIO handling.
> >
> > Why would you need to do that?
> >
> > of_get_named_gpio() does all that for you.
>
> Use the of_get_named_gpio*d*() function instead. My understanding is
> that referring to GPIOs by integer is deprecated and should not be used
> in new code.
I've since conducted some research and have now converted over to
gpiod. Thanks for the pointer.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists