[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1460688147.3847.1.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:42:27 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...hat.com, lizefan@...wei.com, pjt@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET RFC cgroup/for-4.6] cgroup, sched: implement resource
group and PRIO_RGRP
On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 15:57 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Mike.
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 08:07:37AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Let /foo be an exclusive cpuset containing exclusive subset bar.
> > How can any task acquire set foo affinity if B really really
> > applies? My box calls me a dummy if I try to create a "proper"
> > home
> > for tasks, one with both no snobby neighbors and proper affinity.
>
> I'm not sure I quite understand what you're saying. Are you referring
> to the cpuset.{cpu|mem}_exclusive knobs?
Yes.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists