lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:42:27 +0200 From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, lizefan@...wei.com, pjt@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com Subject: Re: [PATCHSET RFC cgroup/for-4.6] cgroup, sched: implement resource group and PRIO_RGRP On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 15:57 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Mike. > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 08:07:37AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Let /foo be an exclusive cpuset containing exclusive subset bar. > > How can any task acquire set foo affinity if B really really > > applies? My box calls me a dummy if I try to create a "proper" > > home > > for tasks, one with both no snobby neighbors and proper affinity. > > I'm not sure I quite understand what you're saying. Are you referring > to the cpuset.{cpu|mem}_exclusive knobs? Yes. -Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists