[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1460740238.19090.35.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:10:38 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix non-static inlines
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 19:00 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Four instances of incorrect usage of non-static "inline" crept up
> in arch/x86, all trivial; cleaning them up:
Thanks and trivia:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/sha-mb/sha1_mb.c b/arch/x86/crypto/sha-mb/sha1_mb.c
[]
> @@ -102,14 +102,14 @@ static asmlinkage struct job_sha1* (*sha1_job_mgr_submit)(struct sha1_mb_mgr *st
[]
> -inline uint32_t sha1_pad(uint8_t padblock[SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE * 2],
> +static inline uint32_t sha1_pad(uint8_t padblock[SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE * 2],
> uint32_t total_len)
It'd be good to reindent the multi-line statements
at the same time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists