[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1460747308.4597.9.camel@hpe.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:08:28 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>, "jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xfs@....sgi.com" <xfs@....sgi.com>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:01 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 11:17 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > > > There's a lot of special casing here, so you might consider
> > > > > > adding comments.
> > > > > Correct - maybe we should reconsider wrapper-izing this? :)
> > > > Another option is just to skip dax_do_io() and this special casing
> > > > fallback entirely if errors are present. I.e. only attempt
> > > > dax_do_io when: IS_DAX() && gendisk->bb && bb->count == 0.
> > >
> > > So, if there's an error anywhere on the device, penalize all I/O (not
> > > just writes, and not just on sectors that are bad)? I'm not sure
> > > that's a great plan, either.
> > >
> > If errors are rare how much are we actually losing in practice?
> > Moreover, we're going to do the full badblocks lookup anyway when we
> > call ->direct_access(). If we had that information earlier we can
> > avoid this fallback dance.
>
> A system running with DAX may have active data set in NVDIMM lager than
> RAM size. In this case, falling back to non-DAX will allocate page cache
> for the data, which will saturate the system with memory pressure.
Oh, sorry, we are still in DIO path. Falling back to DIO should not cause
this issue.
-Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists