[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160415201058.GA20412@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:10:58 -0600
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: integrate *sync code & multi-order radix tree
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 03:03:24PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> With the new addition of the multi-order radix tree support we can simplify
> the DAX *sync PMD support a bit. Instead of manually checking to see if
> our index is covered by a PMD entry we can rely on the new radix tree to
> return the PMD entry if present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Sorry, I should have explicitly called out that this patch (indeed, all
multi-order uses of the radix tree) need to be built upon the recent
multi-order fixes from Matthew and me:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/14/481
I've posted a working tree here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/zwisler/linux.git/log/?h=dax_mo_radix
Thanks,
- Ross
Powered by blists - more mailing lists