lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57115B33.90509@lechnology.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:20:51 -0500
From:	David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: DTS: da850: add node for spi0

On 04/15/2016 03:16 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:17:55 -0500, David Lechner said:
>
>> I omitted this on purpose. For my use case, I am using the SPI as
>> write-only,
>
> So your SPI accesses are fire-and-forget, and nothing ever comes back?

Yes.

> Seems a very dangerous way to design the use case, with no feedback if
> something suddenly goes pear-shaped...

You should tell Sitronix. This is how their display controllers work.

>
> Or do you have ways to verify the status via some method other than SPI?
>

Nope.



I'm working with LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3, a mass-produced robotics system. 
It is what it is. And I have a logic analyzer for when things go 
pear-shaped. ;-)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ