[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4240660.NqlPcXaV7N@wuerfel>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 09:31:59 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jayachandran C <jchandra@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, rafael@...nel.org,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>, jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
msalter@...hat.com, Wangyijing <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 08/13] PCI: generic, thunder: update to use generic ECAM API
On Saturday 16 April 2016 12:50:13 Jayachandran C wrote:
> >
> > I still think it would be better to keep the loadable PCI host drivers
> > separate from the ACPI PCI infrastructure. There are a number of
> > simplifications that we want to do to the DT based drivers in the long
> > run, so it's better if that code is not shared at this level. Abstracting
> > out the ECAM code is fine, but at that point you should be able to just
> > call it from the ACPI layer.
>
> The issue is not with this patch (in my opinion). This patch is just
> re-arranging how thunder specific data is maintained. Earlier it was
> a container_of gen_pci, now it is ->priv of pci_config_window.
>
> I can see the issue in patches 12 and 13 of this patchset which adds
> ACPI fixups into the thunder OF driver.
Right, I commented on this one, because it seems to rearrange the code
in order to do the later one.
> The simple approach when doing modular PCI drivers would be to make
> pci-thunder-*.c like pci-host-common.c, to be compiled in if configured.
> The fie will contain all the Thunder quirks and can export
> pci_thunder_ecam_ops.
I would argue that we should not export anything from drivers/pci/host,
those should really be standalone drivers that do not interact with other
subsystems.
How much code would you need to duplicate from thunder-ecam to have
the same functionality available in ACPI? My expectation is that it's
not really that much more compared to the code you need for sharing
a single implementation, but you get a lower complexity here, which
makes it easier to understand and to rework.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists