[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160416105711.5310d2d0@bbrezillon>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:57:11 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, javier@...hile0.org, fcooper@...com,
nsekhar@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC
NAND on non-OMAP platforms
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:19:51 -0700
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
>
> > Or should I just pull this immutable branch in my current nand/next and
> > let you pull the same immutable branch in omap-soc. I mean, would this
> > prevent conflicts when our branches are merged into linux-next, no
> > matter the order.
>
> Ideally just one or more branches with just minimal changes in
> them against -rc1. But you may have other dependencies in
> your NAND tree so that may no longer be doable :) Usually if
> I merge something that may need to get merged into other
> branches, I just apply them into a separate branch against -rc1
> to start with, then merge that branch in.
Okay, in this case, that's pretty much what I did from the beginning,
except the immutable branch was provided by Roger (based on 4.6-rc1).
Thanks for this detailed explanation, I'll try to remember that when
I'll need to provide an immutable branch for another subsystem.
Roger, my request remains, could you check/test my conflict resolution
(branch nand/next-with-gpmc-rework)?
Thanks,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists