linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Whine about ACCESS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1460908959.19090.95.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Sun, 17 Apr 2016 09:02:39 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Whine about ACCESS_ONCE

On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 13:39 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> A suitably versatile semantic patch is below.  Feel free to update 
> at least the copyright line, and perhaps the initial explanation
> and the strings printed in report and org modes.

Seems sensible enough, thanks Julia.

// Copyright: (C) 2016 Joe Perches, afffiliation?, license?

The structure is all your work so you can mark it as
you please, but for me 'no rights reserved'