linux-kernel - [PATCH] mm/memblock: move memblock_{add,reserve}_region into memblock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:14:36 +0600
From:	Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 0xAX <kuleshovmail@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/memblock: move memblock_{add,reserve}_region into memblock_{add,reserve}

From: 0xAX <kuleshovmail@...il.com>

The memblock_add_region() and memblock_reserve_region do not nothing specific
before the call of the memblock_add_range(), only print debug output.

We can do the same in the memblock_add() and memblock_reserve() since both
memblock_add_region() and memblock_reserve_region are not used by anybody
outside of memblock.c and the memblock_{add,reserve}() have the same set of
flags and nids.

Since the memblock_add_region() and memblock_reserve_region() anyway will be
inlined, there will not be functional changes, but will improve code readability
a little.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>
---
 mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index b570ddd..3b93daa 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -606,22 +606,14 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
 	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, nid, 0);
 }
 
-static int __init_memblock memblock_add_region(phys_addr_t base,
-						phys_addr_t size,
-						int nid,
-						unsigned long flags)
+int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
 	memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx] flags %#02lx %pF\n",
 		     (unsigned long long)base,
 		     (unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
-		     flags, (void *)_RET_IP_);
-
-	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, nid, flags);
-}
+		     0UL, (void *)_RET_IP_);
 
-int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
-{
-	return memblock_add_region(base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
+	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -732,22 +724,14 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 	return memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
 }
 
-static int __init_memblock memblock_reserve_region(phys_addr_t base,
-						   phys_addr_t size,
-						   int nid,
-						   unsigned long flags)
+int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
 	memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%#016llx-%#016llx] flags %#02lx %pF\n",
 		     (unsigned long long)base,
 		     (unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
-		     flags, (void *)_RET_IP_);
-
-	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, nid, flags);
-}
+		     0UL, (void *)_RET_IP_);
 
-int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
-{
-	return memblock_reserve_region(base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
+	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.8.0.rc3.212.g1f992f2.dirty