lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1asESl-0006iN-K2@debutante>
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:03:59 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Applied "regulator: core: remove lockdep assert from suspend_prepare" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: core: remove lockdep assert from suspend_prepare

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 07c5c3ad98926dc15d31aa86de62fd4170f2a745 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:49:53 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: remove lockdep assert from suspend_prepare

suspend_prepare can be called during regulator init time also, where
the mutex is not locked yet. This causes a false lockdep warning.
To avoid the problem, remove the lockdep assertion from the function
causing the issue. An alternative would be to lock the mutex during
init, but this would cause other problems (some APIs used during init
will attempt to lock the mutex also, causing deadlock.)

Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Reported-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 6dd63523bcfe..f28fca4b68e3 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -808,8 +808,6 @@ static int suspend_set_state(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 /* locks held by caller */
 static int suspend_prepare(struct regulator_dev *rdev, suspend_state_t state)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held_once(&rdev->mutex);
-
 	if (!rdev->constraints)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ