[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5715407B.8090506@opensource.altera.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:15:55 -0500
From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@...nsource.altera.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
<pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <tthayer.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add EDAC peripheral init functions & Ethernet EDAC.
On 04/18/2016 03:02 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:27:16AM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
>> We're still getting the single bit correction
>
> By that you mean, you get that by enabling ECC on the FIFO block?
>
Yes, you are correct. I'd still get the single bit correction by
enabling ECC on the FIFO which is a win.
>> which makes the entire system more stable and the ability to see both
>> single bit errors corrected and the number of uncorrectable errors is
>> useful from a system point of view.
>
> If so, that makes sense, yes.
>
> Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists