linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drivers: staging: remove BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57154B8C.5000302@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:03:08 -0700
From:	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:	Tobin C Harding <me@...in.cc>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:	arve@...roid.com, riandrews@...roid.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drivers: staging: remove BUG_ON

On 04/17/2016 05:35 PM, Tobin C Harding wrote:
> drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c calls BUG_ON in places where WARN_ON will
> suffice.
>
> This patch replaces two such occurences. Two other occurences remain.
>

You got the logic flow correct but I'd prefer to keep the BUG_ON.
It's catching actual bugs in the framework.

> Signed-off-by: Tobin C Harding <me@...in.cc>
> ---
>
> Changing the remaining two BUG_ON's causes changes to the programm logic.
>
> This is my first patch set to the kernel, I am as such, not comfortable
> changeing the logic of this file at this early stage of the game. :)
>
>   drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c | 12 +++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
> index 234848f..1e37f52 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
> @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static void ion_buffer_remove_from_handle(struct ion_buffer *buffer)
>   	 */
>   	mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
>   	buffer->handle_count--;
> -	BUG_ON(buffer->handle_count < 0);
> +	WARN_ON(buffer->handle_count < 0);
>   	if (!buffer->handle_count) {
>   		struct task_struct *task;
>
> @@ -556,7 +556,10 @@ static void ion_free_nolock(struct ion_client *client,
>   {
>   	bool valid_handle;
>
> -	BUG_ON(client != handle->client);
> +	if (client != handle->client) {
> +		WARN(1, "%s: client != handle->client.\n", __func__);
> +		return;
> +	}
>
>   	valid_handle = ion_handle_validate(client, handle);
>
> @@ -569,7 +572,10 @@ static void ion_free_nolock(struct ion_client *client,
>
>   void ion_free(struct ion_client *client, struct ion_handle *handle)
>   {
> -	BUG_ON(client != handle->client);
> +	if (client != handle->client) {
> +		WARN(1, "%s: client != handle->client.\n", __func__);
> +		return;
> +	}
>
>   	mutex_lock(&client->lock);
>   	ion_free_nolock(client, handle);
>