[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1461014052-30788-7-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:14:04 -0700
From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ica.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/14] arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk()
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Rework numa_add_memblk() to update the parameter "u64 size" to "u64
end", this will make it consistent with x86 and simplifies the arm64
ACPI NUMA code to be added later.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 12 ++++++------
drivers/of/of_numa.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
index 98dc104..6cb03f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
@@ -131,25 +131,25 @@ void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid)
* numa_add_memblk - Set node id to memblk
* @nid: NUMA node ID of the new memblk
* @start: Start address of the new memblk
- * @size: Size of the new memblk
+ * @end: End address of the new memblk
*
* RETURNS:
* 0 on success, -errno on failure.
*/
-int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
+int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
{
int ret;
- ret = memblock_set_node(start, size, &memblock.memory, nid);
+ ret = memblock_set_node(start, (end - start), &memblock.memory, nid);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("NUMA: memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n",
- start, (start + size - 1), nid);
+ start, (end - 1), nid);
return ret;
}
node_set(nid, numa_nodes_parsed);
pr_info("NUMA: Adding memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] on node %d\n",
- start, (start + size - 1), nid);
+ start, (end - 1), nid);
return ret;
}
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);
for_each_memblock(memory, mblk) {
- ret = numa_add_memblk(0, mblk->base, mblk->size);
+ ret = numa_add_memblk(0, mblk->base, mblk->base + mblk->size);
if (!ret)
continue;
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
index 0f2784b..ed5a097 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
pr_debug("NUMA: base = %llx len = %llx, node = %u\n",
rsrc.start, rsrc.end - rsrc.start + 1, nid);
- r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start,
- rsrc.end - rsrc.start + 1);
+
+ r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start, rsrc.end + 1);
if (r)
break;
}
--
1.7.11.7
Powered by blists - more mailing lists