lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] memory_hotplug: introduce config and command line
 options to set the default onlining policy

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:

> >> > This patchset continues the work I started with:
> >> > 
> >> > commit 31bc3858ea3ebcc3157b3f5f0e624c5962f5a7a6
> >> > Author: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> >> > Date:   Tue Mar 15 14:56:48 2016 -0700
> >> > 
> >> >     memory-hotplug: add automatic onlining policy for the newly added memory
> >> > 
> >> > Initially I was going to stop there and bring the policy setting logic to
> >> > userspace. I met two issues on this way:
> >> > 
> >> > 1) It is possible to have memory hotplugged at boot (e.g. with QEMU). These
> >> >    blocks stay offlined if we turn the onlining policy on by userspace.
> >> > 
> >> > 2) My attempt to bring this policy setting to systemd failed, systemd
> >> >    maintainers suggest to change the default in kernel or ... to use tmpfiles.d
> >> >    to alter the policy (which looks like a hack to me): 
> >> >    https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/2938
> >> 
> >> That discussion really didn't come to a conclusion and I don't
> >> understand why you consider Lennert's "recommended way" to be a hack?
> >> 
> >> > Here I suggest to add a config option to set the default value for the policy
> >> > and a kernel command line parameter to make the override.
> >> 
> >> But the patchset looks pretty reasonable regardless of the above.
> >> 
> >
> > I don't understand why initscripts simply cannot crawl sysfs memory blocks 
> > and online them for the same behavior.
> 
> Yes, they can. With this patchset I don't bring any new features, it's
> rather a convenience so linux distros can make memory hotplug work
> 'out of the box' without such distro-specific initscripts. Memory
> hotplug is a standard feature of all major virt technologies so I think
> it's pretty reasonable to have an option to make it work 'by default'
> available.
> 

I'd personally disagree that we need more and more config options to take 
care of something that an initscript can easily do and most distros 
already have their own initscripts that this can be added to.  I don't see 
anything that the config option adds.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ