[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160418214743.GE1006@dtor-ws>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:47:43 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...a-handheld.com, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] input: twl6040-vibra: ignore return value of
schedule_work
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:55:40PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> returning ret is wrong. And checking for an error as well. User space
> may call multiple times until the work is really scheduled.
>
> twl4030-vibra.c also ignores the return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
Applied, thank you.
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c b/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> index 3805129..69c5940 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> @@ -212,11 +212,7 @@ static int vibra_play(struct input_dev *input, void *data,
> info->strong_speed = effect->u.rumble.strong_magnitude;
> info->direction = effect->direction < EFFECT_DIR_180_DEG ? 1 : -1;
>
> - ret = schedule_work(&info->play_work);
> - if (!ret) {
> - dev_info(&input->dev, "work is already on queue\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> + schedule_work(&info->play_work);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.7.3
>
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists