lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160418022513.612704616@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:29:18 +0900
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>, David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>,
	Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 096/137] rbd: use GFP_NOIO consistently for request allocations

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>

commit 2224d879c7c0f85c14183ef82eb48bd875ceb599 upstream.

As of 5a60e87603c4c533492c515b7f62578189b03c9c, RBD object request
allocations are made via rbd_obj_request_create() with GFP_NOIO.
However, subsequent OSD request allocations in rbd_osd_req_create*()
use GFP_ATOMIC.

With heavy page cache usage (e.g. OSDs running on same host as krbd
client), rbd_osd_req_create() order-1 GFP_ATOMIC allocations have been
observed to fail, where direct reclaim would have allowed GFP_NOIO
allocations to succeed.

Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Suggested-by: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/block/rbd.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -1955,7 +1955,7 @@ static struct ceph_osd_request *rbd_osd_
 
 	osdc = &rbd_dev->rbd_client->client->osdc;
 	osd_req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(osdc, snapc, num_ops, false,
-					  GFP_ATOMIC);
+					  GFP_NOIO);
 	if (!osd_req)
 		return NULL;	/* ENOMEM */
 
@@ -2004,7 +2004,7 @@ rbd_osd_req_create_copyup(struct rbd_obj
 	rbd_dev = img_request->rbd_dev;
 	osdc = &rbd_dev->rbd_client->client->osdc;
 	osd_req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(osdc, snapc, num_osd_ops,
-						false, GFP_ATOMIC);
+						false, GFP_NOIO);
 	if (!osd_req)
 		return NULL;	/* ENOMEM */
 
@@ -2506,7 +2506,7 @@ static int rbd_img_request_fill(struct r
 					bio_chain_clone_range(&bio_list,
 								&bio_offset,
 								clone_size,
-								GFP_ATOMIC);
+								GFP_NOIO);
 			if (!obj_request->bio_list)
 				goto out_unwind;
 		} else if (type == OBJ_REQUEST_PAGES) {


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ