[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJBJ56L5-HXYv=0dHdOm2Fz_ewq0-o=V5nkn4bojLyS7bDB02A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:30:36 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>
Cc: "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"german.rivera@...escale.com" <german.rivera@...escale.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yang-Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: ls2080a: fsl-mc dt node updates
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:39:32PM +0000, Stuart Yoder wrote:
>> > > @@ -265,6 +265,93 @@
>> > > compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc";
>> > > reg = <0x00000008 0x0c000000 0 0x40>, /* MC portal base */
>> > > <0x00000000 0x08340000 0 0x40000>; /* MC control reg */
>> > > + msi-parent = <&its>;
>> > > + #address-cells = <3>;
>> > > + #size-cells = <1>;
>> > > +
>> > > + /*
>> > > + * Region type 0x0 - MC portals
>> > > + * Region type 0x1 - QBMAN portals
>> > > + */
>> > > + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x8 0x0c000000 0x4000000
>> > > + 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x8 0x18000000 0x8000000>;
>> > > +
>> > > + /*
>> > > + * Define the maximum number of MACs present on the SoC.
>> > > + * They won't necessarily be all probed, since the
>> > > + * Data Path Layout file and the MC firmware can put
>> > > + * fewer actual DPMAC objects on the MC bus.
>> > > + */
>> > > + dpmacs {
>> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
>> > > + #size-cells = <0>;
>> > > +
>> > > + dpmac1: dpmac@1 {
>> > > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
>> >
>> > I did not see how this compatible is used by kernel driver.
>>
>> There is no driver yet, but it will be coming soon. But, does
>> it matter? Device trees should be describing hardware
>> without regards to some specific kernel use of a node or
>> property.
>
> We need to at least have the bindings documented before we can accept it
> in dts files.
Ah, sorry. Missed that the bindings are added by patch 1/2.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists