| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 23:31:43 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> To: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org Cc: waiman.long@....com, dave@...olabs.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de> Subject: [PATCH -tip 3/3] locking/pvqspinlock: Robustify init_qspinlock_stat() Specifically around the debugfs file creation calls, I have no idea if they could ever possibly fail, but this is core code (debug aside) so lets at least check the return value and inform anything fishy. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de> --- kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h index 72722334237a..ddcd653c942c 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h @@ -225,12 +225,18 @@ static int __init init_qspinlock_stat(void) * performance. */ for (i = 0; i < qstat_num; i++) - debugfs_create_file(qstat_names[i], 0400, d_qstat, - (void *)(long)i, &fops_qstat); + if (!debugfs_create_file(qstat_names[i], 0400, d_qstat, + (void *)(long)i, &fops_qstat)) + goto fail; + + if (!debugfs_create_file(qstat_names[qstat_reset_cnts], 0200, d_qstat, + (void *)(long)qstat_reset_cnts, &fops_qstat)) + goto fail; - debugfs_create_file(qstat_names[qstat_reset_cnts], 0200, d_qstat, - (void *)(long)qstat_reset_cnts, &fops_qstat); return 0; +fail: + debugfs_remove_recursive(d_qstat); + return 1; } fs_initcall(init_qspinlock_stat); -- 2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists