lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMGffEm4AOZu+3=HxfNQVvvMuLkWWEDrTDrpqbSe3wX0u_=5cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:34:19 +0200
From:	Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@...fitbricks.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2]brd: set max_discard_sectors properly

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>> -     blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(brd->brd_queue, UINT_MAX);
>> +     blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(brd->brd_queue, UINT_MAX >> 9);
>
> Shouldn't we fix the issue by capping to UINT_MAX >> 9 inside
> blk_queue_max_discard_sectors?  That way we'll prevent against having
> issues like this in any other driver as well.


Thanks Christoph, make sense to me, will rework it to this way.

Regards,
Jack

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ