lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:46:35 +0800
From:	lizf@...nel.org
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 90/92] pipe: Fix buffer offset after partially failed read

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>

3.4.112-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


Quoting the RHEL advisory:

> It was found that the fix for CVE-2015-1805 incorrectly kept buffer
> offset and buffer length in sync on a failed atomic read, potentially
> resulting in a pipe buffer state corruption. A local, unprivileged user
> could use this flaw to crash the system or leak kernel memory to user
> space. (CVE-2016-0774, Moderate)

The same flawed fix was applied to stable branches from 2.6.32.y to
3.14.y inclusive, and I was able to reproduce the issue on 3.2.y.
We need to give pipe_iov_copy_to_user() a separate offset variable
and only update the buffer offset if it succeeds.

References: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0103.html
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
---
 fs/pipe.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index abfb935..6049235 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *_iov,
 			void *addr;
 			size_t chars = buf->len, remaining;
 			int error, atomic;
+			int offset;
 
 			if (chars > total_len)
 				chars = total_len;
@@ -403,9 +404,10 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *_iov,
 
 			atomic = !iov_fault_in_pages_write(iov, chars);
 			remaining = chars;
+			offset = buf->offset;
 redo:
 			addr = ops->map(pipe, buf, atomic);
-			error = pipe_iov_copy_to_user(iov, addr, &buf->offset,
+			error = pipe_iov_copy_to_user(iov, addr, &offset,
 						      &remaining, atomic);
 			ops->unmap(pipe, buf, addr);
 			if (unlikely(error)) {
@@ -421,6 +423,7 @@ redo:
 				break;
 			}
 			ret += chars;
+			buf->offset += chars;
 			buf->len -= chars;
 
 			/* Was it a packet buffer? Clean up and exit */
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists