[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5714E12A.8090100@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:29:14 -0400
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Fix possible ABBA deadlock by keeping I2C
clock prepared
Hello Marek,
On 04/18/2016 03:50 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2016-04-16 00:04, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The exynos5 I2C controller driver always prepares and enables a clock
>> before using it and then disables unprepares it when the clock is not
>> used anymore.
>>
>> But this can cause a possible ABBA deadlock in some scenarios since a
>> driver that uses regmap to access its I2C registers, will first grab
>> the regmap lock and then the I2C xfer function will grab the prepare
>> lock when preparing the I2C clock. But since the clock driver also
>> uses regmap for I2C accesses, preparing a clock will first grab the
>> prepare lock and then the regmap lock when using the regmap API.
>>
>> An example of this happens on the Exynos5422 Odroid XU board where a
>> s2mps11 PMIC is used and both the s2mps11 regulators and clk drivers
>> share the same I2C regmap.
>>
>> The possible deadlock is reported by the kernel lockdep:
>>
>> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>>
>> CPU0 CPU1
>> ---- ----
>> lock(sec_core:428:(regmap)->lock);
>> lock(prepare_lock);
>> lock(sec_core:428:(regmap)->lock);
>> lock(prepare_lock);
>>
>> *** DEADLOCK ***
>>
>> Fix this by only preparing the clock on probe and {en,dis}able in the
>> rest of the driver.
>>
>> This patch is similar to commit 34e81ad5f0b6 ("i2c: s3c2410: fix ABBA
>> deadlock by keeping clock prepared") that fixes the same bug in other
>> driver for an I2C controller found in Samsung SoCs.
>
> I'm sorry, but this is not the right approach imho. It is just a workaround
> applied to specific driver, it also duplicates incorrect clock usage
> pattern (there is really no point keeping clock prepared all the time).
>
> IMHO this ABBA deadlock should be really fixed in clocks core (probably
> by removing global prepare mutex and replacing it with per clock
> controller mutexes). Without a proper patch this issue will hit us again
> with other i2c controllers or other drivers as well.
>
Agreed, Krzysztof mentioned the same before. I'll take a look to the global
mutex to see how I can make it more fine grained to prevent these deadlocks.
>> Reported-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists