[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160418134544.GA13675@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:45:44 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pi3orama@....com,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] perf tools: Derive trigger class from
auxtrace_snapshot
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:32:08AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
> Use 'trigger' to model operations which need to be executed when
> an event (a signal, for example) is observed.
>
> States and transits:
>
> OFF--(on)--> READY --(toggle)--> TOGGLED --(process)--> PROCESSING
> ^ | |
> | | |
> | (ready) (ready)
> | | |
> \__________________/______________________/
>
> is_toggled and is_ready are two key functions to query the state of
> a trigger. is_toggled means the event already happen; is_ready means the
> trigger is waiting for the event.
>
> 'PROCESSING' represents a state the event happens and be observed, and
> the processing is on the way so can't accept a new event immediately.
hum, I must be missing something.. but I dont see how you're
using this state except for smal window within:
if (auxtrace_snapshot_is_toggled()) {
-> auxtrace_snapshot_process();
if (!auxtrace_snapshot_is_error())
-> record__read_auxtrace_snapshot(rec);
but no other place queries or depends on this state
also the switch_output code does not seem to use this transition at all
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists