linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: imx6: Add dts for Embest MarS Board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMZO5DwOa8s_tBJWpOjcxt0hj6befxjPFwVH57SOO5J5Hm5fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:22:42 -0300
From:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:	Sergio Prado <sergio.prado@...abworks.com>
Cc:	"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: imx6: Add dts for Embest MarS Board

Hi Sergio,

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Sergio Prado
<sergio.prado@...abworks.com> wrote:

> Although the boards are similar, there are a lot of differences:
>
> Marsboard -> imx6dual, no sound, sst25vf016b spi flash, 1 external sd/mmc
> interface (sdhc2) and one eMMC (sdhc3), different PMUX config for no sdhc3,
> no pmic, i2c1, i2c2 and i2c3 externally available, no ssi interface.
>
> Riotboard -> imx6solo, sound (sgtl5000), no spi flash, 2 external sd/mmc
> interface (sdhc2 and sdhc3) and one eMMC (sdhc4), pmic (pfuze100), i2c1,
> i2c2 and i2c4 externally available, ssi interface.
>
> We could certainly create a dtsi file to be shared between them, but I do
> not know if it is worth the effort.
>
> What do you think?

Ok, it seems it is not worth to share a device tree between them.