[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5716315C.7070001@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:23:40 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Wenkai Du <wenkai.du@...el.com>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Improve marking broken HPI through
devicetree
On 4/19/2016 3:21 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>>> In patch 81f8a7be66 Hans de Goede added a patch to allow marking an mmc
>>
>> scripts/checkpatch.pl now enforces certain commit citing style, the
>> commit summary should be specified too.
> I used checkpatch from 4.6.0-rc2(or3) and did not notice it. But I'll add it
> to v2.
Maybe it just didn't recognize your commit citing? Anyway, the format is
the same as for the "Fixes:" tag.
>>> device as to having an broken HPI implementation. After talking some
>>> with Hans, we now think it is actually the mmc controller that can be
>>> broken and not support broken HPI's.
>>>
>>> This patch adds a new capability, mmc-broken-hpi, which allows us to
>>> mark a broken hpi implementation on the host level.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
>> [...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists