[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEzqOZvku4i=Ct7E8uj4tF60F0aTJzedRQ_DERPC-q829aXWAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:42:41 +0800
From: Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>, xiaolong.ye@...el.com,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: add predivider handling for factors clock
Hello Wens,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:53:47AM +0800, Vishnu Patekar wrote:
>>> Both of these patches in series has to be applied at the same time.
>>> I think this is the reason, it fails.
>
> You should probably squash the second patch into the first.
Yes, I should have, I'll send v2 by combining both patches into one.
>
> ChenYu
>
>> hi Xiaolong, would you help do a check whether we apply the patches in correct sequence for this case?
>>
>>
>>> On 17 Apr 2016 09:26, "kbuild test robot" <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Vishnu,
>>> >
>>> > [auto build test ERROR on clk/clk-next]
>>> > [also build test ERROR on v4.6-rc3 next-20160415]
>>> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
>>> > help improving the system]
>>> >
>>> > url:
>>> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vishnu-Patekar/sunxi-factors-clock-predivider-handling/20160417-025801
>>> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git
>>> > clk-next
>>> > config: arm-sunxi_defconfig (attached as .config)
>>> > reproduce:
>>> > wget
>>> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
>>> > -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>> > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>> > make.cross ARCH=arm
>>> >
>>> > Note: the
>>> > linux-review/Vishnu-Patekar/sunxi-factors-clock-predivider-handling/20160417-025801
>>> > HEAD 19bb5fc952754381d9f4f9b2e57a1fa09f467359 builds fine.
>>> > It only hurts bisectibility.
>>> >
>>> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>> >
>>> > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c: In function 'sun6i_get_ahb1_factors':
>>> > >> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:310:9: error: 'struct factors_request'
>>> > has no member named 'parent_index'
>>> > if (req->parent_index == SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6) {
>>> > ^
>>> > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c: In function 'sun6i_ahb1_recalc':
>>> > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:340:9: error: 'struct factors_request'
>>> > has no member named 'parent_index'
>>> > if (req->parent_index == SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6)
>>> > ^
>>> >
>>> > vim +310 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
>>> >
>>> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 304 if (req->parent_rate && req->rate
>>> > > req->parent_rate)
>>> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 305 req->rate =
>>> > req->parent_rate;
>>> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 306
>>> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 307 div =
>>> > DIV_ROUND_UP(req->parent_rate, req->rate);
>>> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 308
>>> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 309 /* calculate pre-divider if parent
>>> > is pll6 */
>>> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 @310 if (req->parent_index ==
>>> > SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6) {
>>> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 311 if (div < 4)
>>> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 312 calcp = 0;
>>> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 313 else if (div / 2 < 4)
>>> >
>>> > :::::: The code at line 310 was first introduced by commit
>>> > :::::: a78bb35552a800949b2bf68f372d3d6ccabdd790 clk: sunxi: rewrite
>>> > sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk using factors clk with custom recalc
>>> >
>>> > :::::: TO: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>>> > :::::: CC: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
>>> >
>>> > ---
>>> > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology
>>> > Center
>>> > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel
>>> > Corporation
>>> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists